Attorney Articles

Instructing the Jury on Primary Assumption of the Risk (Reprinted with permission from the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, Trial Bar News) Jeremy K. Robinson – Chair of CaseyGerry’s Motion and Appellate Practice We’ve all seen the summary judgment motion based on primary assumption of the risk. 

Show some class: The case of Ardon v. City of Los Angeles (Reprinted with permission from the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, Trial Bar News)   Jeremy K. Robinson – Chair of CaseyGerry’s Motion and Appellate Practice   This month, I want to briefly examine a fairly significant decision that may have snuck under most people’s radar: Ardon v.

The Discretionary Function Exception to Liability Under The Federal Tort Claims Act (Reprinted with permission from the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, Trial Bar News)   Jeremy K. Robinson – Chair of CaseyGerry’s Motion and Appellate Practice In the past, I have written about some of the immunities given to state and local governmental entities under the Government Claims Act.

Daily Journal — Patricia Zlaket

Patricia Zlaket from CaseyGerry on Vimeo.

Last year was especially tough for plaintiffs/consumers in the world of pharmaceutical litigation.

The United States Supreme Court decision in PLIVA, Inc.,

Daily Journal – David S. Casey, Jr.

It is hard to grasp that we are nearing the tenth anniversary of 9/11. Images of that horrible day, when thousands of innocent victims died in the first foreign attacks on U.S.

Daily Journal – Jessica Klarer Pride

The sluggish economy has been good and bad for the legal profession. The downside is obvious: a surge in layoffs, fewer billable hours and overall workplace malaise.

Daily Journal — Thomas D. Penfield

Because of the increasing threat of terrorism, the Supreme Court is revisiting Civil War and WWII era cases.

This renewed interest in historical cases will surely resurrect the saga of Dr.

Trial Bar News – Jeremy K. Robinson

This month I wanted to discuss an interesting issue that may arise when a plaintiff is pursuing a case against a defendant who already has been criminally prosecuted for the harm that forms the predicate for the civil action.