Bloomberg Law spoke with CaseyGerry partner Jeremy Robinson on the recent court decision in Loomis v. Amazon.com, LLC and the widespread implication of the decision on online marketplaces.
In Loomis v.
Woodcreek Pediatrics – Mary Bridge Children’s, a Washington state based pediatric healthcare provider, has reported a data breach in association with their IT vendor, Netgain Technology LLC. According to the Woodcreek Pediatrics website, highly sensitive data of applicants, contractors, employees, patients, parents and guardians of patients, and providers was stolen.
After a car accident, there are steps that victims must take to recover compensation for their injuries and vehicle repairs. A vital one is filing a claim with the at-fault driver’s or your insurance company.
Having to wait for a settlement check you desperately need after a car accident can be stressful. You may be facing extensive medical bills and lost income from being unable to work and need cash in hand.
Health Center Partners of Southern California (HCP) reported a data breach that exposed sensitive data.
According to the notice of breach filed with the Attorney General’s office, Health Center Partners of Southern California (HCP) reported that NetGain Technology, LLC, the company’s service provider, experienced a cyberattack when their system was infiltrated by an unauthorized third party who had gained access to the data of several NetGain clients including Health Center Partners of Southern California (HCP).
On April 26, 2021, Division Eight of the California Court of Appeal for the Second District delivered another decisive loss to Amazon and its quest to avoid liability for products sold on its online marketplace.
Proving fault for a car accident is vital to receiving the compensation you deserve for your injuries. In certain cases, it is relatively simple to determine who was at fault for a crash, but unfortunately, things rarely go so smoothly.
As a personal injury law firm with decades of experience, we understand that selecting the right representation could significantly impact not only the outcome of a case but the experience of the plaintiff.
